![]() |
![]() |
| Green Liberal Democrats | <info@greenlibdems.org.uk> | 2nd December 2008 |
WILL GHOST FLEET HAUNT BRITISH WATERS WAITING ON DRY DOCK DECISION? - BAKER12.00.00am UTC (GMT +0000) Fri 31st Oct 2003
Plans to dismantle the ghost fleet, currently en route to Teeside, have been blocked by the Environment Agency. The decision was prompted when the agency discovered that relevant planning permission for dry docking facilities had not been secured. Norman Baker MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Environment Secretary is calling on the Department of Transport to clarify what will happen to the fleet in the short term. "The Department for Transport should have ensured that dry dock facilities were available before the fleet started out on its journey. "Because of this farce, will the ships now have to drop anchor in British waters and wait for the relevant permissions, or be sent straight back to the United States? "It is grossly unacceptable to have old, decrepit vessels contaminated with PCBs, asbestos and fuel oil, waiting in stormy British waters for that decision. "If they break up, the environmental impact could be devastating."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Mon 2nd Aug 2004: British athletes should go for environmental gold in Athens - Baker. Thu 13th May 2004: Government handling of Ghost Fleet a complete farce - Baker. Mon 8th Dec 2003: Ghost fleet ruling: Ships must go back to US - Baker. Tue 2nd Dec 2003: Russia's decision on Kyoto desperately sad news - Baker. BAKER VISITS GHOST FLEET TO DEMAND ANSWERS. Thu 20th Nov 2003: MANDELSON SHOULD THINK AGAIN ON GHOST SHIPS - BAKER. Wed 12th Nov 2003: GHOST SHIP DOCKING A DISGRACE - BAKER. Wed 5th Nov 2003: GHOST FLEET MUST RETURN TO U.S. - BAKER. Wed 22nd Oct 2003: GOVERNMENT FAILING TO ACT ON GHOST FLEET - BAKER. Fri 17th Oct 2003: Published and promoted by Green Liberal Democrats, 39 Azof Street, Greenwich, London SE10 0EG. The views expressed in all articles and news items of this site should only be assumed to be those of the individual authors themselves and are not necessarily those of the Liberal Democrats, the Green Liberal Democrats, or the service provider. |