![]() |
![]() |
| Green Liberal Democrats | <info@greenlibdems.org.uk> | 2nd December 2008 |
Did Blair silence David King under US pressure? - Baker1.09.35pm UTC (GMT +0000) Mon 8th Mar 2004
Reports in The Independent today claim that a leaked memo proves Downing Street attempted to silence the chief scientific adviser, Sir David King, after he warned global warming was more serious a threat than terrorism. Commenting, Norman Baker MP, Liberal Democrat Shadow Environment Secretary, said: "If these reports are true, this is a disgraceful attempt by the Prime Minister's office to muzzle the country's leading scientist. "Blair must now make a clear statement explaining why this unacceptable and ill-judged memo was sent by his principal private secretary. Did Blair censor Sir David King to prevent the Americans becoming upset, or was it a direct result of American pressure? "Sir David has a duty, on behalf of the nation, to speak up. He must not be pushed around like some trainee civil servant. His advice that climate change is at least as big a threat to us as terrorism is clear, and has been echoed by Hans Blix only yesterday. "The Prime Minister is letting the country down. He needs to show the same urgency in tackling climate change as he has done in tackling terrorism. Sadly, it seems he's keener to cave into the Americans."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Tue 22nd Feb 2005: Blair fails to tackle Bush on climate change again - Baker. Tue 25th Jan 2005: Blair must not allow US to deflect him from tough new climate change targets - Baker. Sun 12th Sep 2004: Blair and Howard can't be trusted with stewardship of Britain's environment - Baker. Wed 14th Jul 2004: Government must not ignore Sir David King's 'apocalyptic' warning - Baker. Thu 17th Jun 2004: Blair must stop ducking aviation issue before it's too late - Baker . Tue 27th Apr 2004: Published and promoted by Green Liberal Democrats, 39 Azof Street, Greenwich, London SE10 0EG. The views expressed in all articles and news items of this site should only be assumed to be those of the individual authors themselves and are not necessarily those of the Liberal Democrats, the Green Liberal Democrats, or the service provider. |